Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris Nichols's avatar

"ensure developers contribute fairly to community needs." see Malabar RD development to see how well this works; dumbass politicians.

Okay "Councilman Hammer voiced his support for Langevin's motion,"; "This council has ambitious goals, including improving infrastructure and ensuring public safety, and I believe we need someone at the helm who is fully committed to meeting those objectives without hesitation." I know who to contract for the Cities Septic conversion program that we have been waiting a year to complete and getting the run around.

Expand full comment
Tom Mars's avatar

Thanks Tom for the summary. I have yet to watch the full meeting. Having been lectured by the national media on a certain Congressman's efforts to fire the then House Speaker Kevin McCarthy without a replacement strategy in mind, I draw a similar analogy here. I have no problem firing people in government (we could do with a lot less govt employees IMO) I find it odd doing it w/o a replacement on the bench ? The previous City Mgr was also fired (due to privacy rules, I was never able to understand why?) Is this position in the City becoming a scapegoat? This case seems to be a termination for cause. I have a lot of issues with some City policies but it seems from 30,000 ft Suzanne was just the instrument of the council.? Not to mention as a taxpayer I'm on the hook for another severance package. Is this simply a metaphor for there's a new Sherrif (Council) in town , things will be different and we're demonstrating our commitment by firing the executor of previous Council policy? I'll watch the meeting this weekend and hopefully answer some of my own questions. Thanks

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts