The Palm Bay City Council recently held a meeting that left many questions unanswered for local citizens. A key agenda item to reconsider the broadcasting of public comments was postponed, keeping a controversial policy in place. While other decisions were made, including a new lease with T-Mobile and new restrictions for city employees, the delay on transparency raises questions about the council's priorities and what it means for residents. What caused the postponement, and what were the legal reasons given for the initial policy? Dive deeper into what this means for Palm Bay right here. Explore the full story on our website.
Discussion about this post
No posts
transparency on hold increases ignorance and you have to question what kind of govt at any level wants that.
I might be opening a can of worms, however, I was wondering if anyone has checked to see that the council of Palm Bay City had indeed been following the Sunshine law?