Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard Hammer's avatar

Karen, I appreciate your comment and the questions you’ve raised. To provide some clarity, I left the city because of the leadership and a working environment that I found unacceptable. As a whistleblower, I brought forward issues that I believed needed to be addressed, but like others in similar positions, I felt those concerns fell on deaf ears. Bad people were allowed to do bad things for far too long.

Remaining in that environment would have compromised my values and my ability to serve the city with integrity. While it’s not an easy decision to leave, I felt it was necessary given the circumstances. Thank you for taking the time to bring attention to this—I believe transparency and accountability are crucial for our city’s future.

Expand full comment
Karen's avatar

I believe Ms Smith is incorrect on the Sunshine Law. I thought of her statement as a cya.

Mayor Medina was wrong to interject while citizens spoke. I get he’s tired of the former deputy talking negatively about the current chief. However, has anyone really looked?

Was he treated poorly by the CM , as a whistleblower? Other former employees have said as whistleblowers their issues fell on deaf ears.

We have a newly elected person in council, who’s a former city employee. My question is why is he a former employee

I agreed with the former commissioner up until she took a political shot. We elected them in a non partisan race.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts